QKITE LEDGER THE VAULT

Shared truth.
Private data.

Your business network.
Your rules of trust.

A permissioned Layer 1 design built around post-quantum cryptography, for organizations that need shared facts and private business data.

Private collections · Named organizations · Verifiable decisions

THE QKITE LEDGER NETWORKILLUSTRATIVE VIEW
QKite LedgerONE SHARED LEDGER
Select a participant to see their view ↗
LETTER OF CREDIT #04812 Verified
Issuing bank’s view Private details accessible
ACCESSPermissionedDATAPrivate by collectionDECISIONSPolicy-drivenHISTORYShared & auditable

THE ENTERPRISE TRUST LAYER

Agree on the outcome.
Protect the underlying data.

A business network should not need to choose between a shared source of truth and confidentiality. Ledger’s architecture separates the ordered record from the private execution behind it.

01Shared ledgerOne ordered history for the network
02Private collectionsData held by the organizations that belong
03Attestation policiesExplicit rules for whose agreement counts

Trust is a rule you can inspect.

Collection members execute a business action and attest its result. Validators check that the required organizations signed the same result under the committed policy.

The design does not require validators to read a collection’s private payload. Membership and policy remain visible so the network can understand how a result was accepted.

Read the Ledger architecture →
Policies you can read

Trust rules are public, versioned and on the ledger.

Who must agree before something counts is not hidden in a vendor's database. Each smart contract declares an attestation policy for every function. The policy is committed to the ledger, and a change is a new version everyone can inspect.

  • And requires every listed party.
  • Or accepts any one of them.
  • OutOf requires a threshold, such as 3 of 5.
policy: release_payment v2
  • And
    • Issuing Bank
    • Or
      • Advising Bank
      • Confirming Bank
    • OutOf 2
      • Inspector A
      • Inspector B
      • Inspector C

FROM ARCHITECTURE TO OPERATIONS

Enterprise readiness
is more than a chain.

Identity, deployment boundaries, operational ownership, and evidence requirements need to be agreed before a production network begins.

01 / PRIVATE DEPLOYMENT

Define the boundary.

Specify the participating organizations, collection members, node locations, and permitted business actions. Decide who operates the network and how membership changes.

02 / AUDIT & COMPLIANCE

Design for evidence.

Map attestation history, access policies, retention, and review responsibilities to your organization’s requirements. Auditability supports review; it is not a compliance certification.

03 / SERVICE & SUPPORT

Agree the operating model.

Set availability targets, support ownership, backup and recovery procedures, and incident expectations during deployment planning. Published SLA guarantees are not yet available.

04 / WORKFLOW EVALUATION

Test the actual process.

Evaluate representative records, failure scenarios, and policy combinations before rollout. The workflow examples here are illustrative, not customer case-study claims.

DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP

Build confidence.
Then scale the deployment.

Proposed development priorities. Timing and launch dates have not been announced; these milestones do not indicate completed releases.

01

Protocol & deployment foundations

Document organization identity, private collections, policy evaluation, and network operating responsibilities.

QKite Ledger
Proposed
02

Reference business workflows

Develop and evaluate Trade Ledger, CredVault, Chain of Custody, Consortium Vote, and BidSeal against representative scenarios.

All five application tracks
Proposed
03

Controls & operational review

Assess privacy boundaries, contract behavior, audit evidence, deployment security, backup, and failure recovery.

Security review & enterprise evaluation
Proposed
04

Deployment readiness

Define release criteria, support terms, service targets, and controlled rollout guidance with the participating organizations.

Operations & service model
Proposed

PROPOSED APPLICATION TRACKS

What each workflow needs to prove.

ApplicationDevelopment focusValidation focus

Trade Ledger

Development focusLetters of credit, document attestations, and invoice registration.

Validation focusPayment policy combinations and the limits of same-network duplicate detection.

CredVault

Development focusCredential issuance, signed verification, and revocation flows.

Validation focusIssuer authority, revocation freshness, and the information disclosed by each answer.

Chain of Custody

Development focusProduct identity, ownership handoffs, and recall workflows.

Validation focusTransfer policies and the boundary between ledger evidence and physical authenticity.

Consortium Vote

Development focusMembership, ballot recording, tallying, and approval policies.

Validation focusAuditor visibility, quorum rules, and the limits of receipt and collusion guarantees.

BidSeal

Development focusBid commitments, authorized reveal, and award decisions.

Validation focusReveal timing, supplier-held bids, and the evidence behind each procurement decision.

CONFIDENTIALITY WITHOUT ISOLATION

Keep your data private.
Make your decisions verifiable.